1. Coronation Oath act 1688
2. Bill of Rights 1689
3. Act of Settlement 1700
4. Treason Act 1351, 1702, and 1851
A superior statute is done by kings/queens for all time for example, the Bill of Rights was brought about by William and Mary of orange back in 1688 and the bill of rights still stands today because only a Monarch can change this…
In the case of HHJ Watkins it was said that “Judges who breach their oaths are not Judges at all. The law is designed to work that way Judges who breach their oaths are not judges immune from prosecution” the article goes on to say “it is the duty of the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice to ensure judicial independence and to discipline the Judiciary, yet they deliberately fail to do so, a gross dereliction of duty constituting the offence of misconduct/breach of duty/corruption in public office”.
It continues to say “All those with a responsibility for the courts, Judges and Justice system have a legal duty in S. 3 of the Constitutional Reforms Act 2005 to maintain the continued independence of the Judiciary” and the one law conferred in the Promissory Oath Act 1868 designed to protect the public from tyranny and abuse of powers by Judicial office holders is affronted by the two office holders (Raab and Burnett) who are paid by the tax payer to ensure that Judges behave in a constitutional proper way.”
All “Judges who knowingly act outside of their jurisdiction are afforded no protection by Judicial immunity (See Sirros v Moore 1974 QB).
In this case against HHJ Watkins the particulars of claim stated “The Defendant abused his position as a public officer falsifying a virtual hearing that does not exist on the official public records at Bristol Civil Justice Centre or the Ministry of Justice records. These facts have been kindly confirmed by the Ministry of Justice when they completed a Subject Access Request”
The case goes on to say “the Defendant created a virtual link via Microsoft Teams to hold a 12 minute virtual hearing without my consent, ex-parte and without my presence. He defrauded me. “
Learn these superior statutes and beat any case period because these are here for all time…
In Archbolds Criminal Evidence and Pleadings it clearly states that to ignore superior statutes is indeed a criminal offence…
Everything since 1973 is void all non-regal governments and all legislation brought in by there alleged governments…
No comments:
Post a Comment