Monday, July 9, 2018

National ID Card: URGENT AND EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, ESPECIALLY FOR BRITAIN:

http://www.natural-person.ca/nationalid.html

This page has been posted as an introductory page for the National ID Card.  A more comprehensive page is begin prepared and should be ready soon.  Until such time, this should make you think about the dangers of having a National ID Card: 

Question: What is wrong with a National ID Card? 
Answer: Nothing, as long as you don't mind being a slave for the rest of your life. 

Question: How does a National ID Card make me a slave?
Answer: The Card 'identifies' you as the property of the government. 

Question: What is the definition of Identify and/or Identity? Answer: The definition of Identify and/or Identity means 'the same as'. 

Question: How can a National ID Card make me the property of the government? 
Answer: The ID Card is only for legal entities, and therefore the Card 'identifies' you to be 'the same as' the legal entity (artificial person) which exists on the Card. 

Question: Who has legal title to the ID Card? 
Answer: The government has legal title to the ID Card (they created it), and therefore has legal title to the legal entity (artificial person) created thereon.  The holder of the ID Card may have equitable title (to use) the Card. 

Question: What happens when I agree to have a National ID Card? Answer: By agreeing to be identified by the Card, you have just agreed (by contract) to be 'the same as' the legal entity which was created by the government.  In other words, you have agreed, by contract, to be owned by the government (because they own the entity and now you have agreed to be the same as the entity, so they own you). 

Question: Can I terminate the contract if I already have a National ID Card? 
Answer: No.  According to contract law, unless written otherwise into the contract, the contract will only be terminated when both parties to the contract agree to termination.  Although you may wish to terminate the contract, the government will never agree to do so.  You are their slave for life, and your property (children, estate, etc.)  becomes their property in perpetuity (forever).

Question: Who can identify me? 
Answer: You, your God (if he shows up), and possibly your parents (provided babies were not swapped).  Practically speaking, only YOU can identify you for sure, nobody else.  You have to self-identify, viz: "I am the same as I am, I am I and nobody else." 

Question: How can a government tell me who I am? 
Answer: The government cannot tell you who you are, but if you agree to be the same as their entity, now they can tell you who you are and make you their slave. 

Solution: Know who you are, and don't let anybody else tell you who you are.  Whatever you do, DO NOT agree to have a National ID Card if you wish to remain free.  

A slave once said "Oh master, please tell me who I am."

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Names are Designators of Things

The Name Game

Designator

================================================
the name of a person is the designator of a human being (in common parlance), by which the person is called or known. Nowhere in any of these definitions is the claim made that the name “identifies” the person (or human being), and nowhere is any claim made that the name of a person is to be regarded to be the same as that person. ================================================
From an ordinary dictionary (not a law dictionary) we get the ordinary meaning of words.  Later on, we deal with law dictionaries, but for now, we stay with “ordinary” meanings.  From the “ordinary” online Dictionary Definition (www.dictionary.com), we check the definition of the word “name”, and we read that a name is used to designate (point to) or call things or refer to known things.  From this definition you can see that the name of an item is not the same as the item itself, but is a means to designate the item: name - (from www.dictionary.com) - ordinary meaning: noun 

1. a word or a combination of words by which a person, place, or thing, a body or class, or any object of thought is designated, called, or known.  

2. mere designation, as distinguished from fact: He was a king in name only.  

3. an appellation, title, or epithet, applied descriptively, in honour, abuse, etc.  

4. a reputation of a particular kind given by common opinion: to protect one's good name.  

5. a distinguished, famous, or great reputation; fame: to make a name for oneself.  From definition #1 above, we see that a name is a word (or combination) by which something (an item) is “designated, called, or known”.  

Thus, the name is not the same as the item itself; it is how we refer to the item.  Definition number “2” gives an alternative understanding of a name as a “mere designation, as distinguished from fact”.  

What about the name of a person? Same things apply.  As an example, let's incorporate the word “person” from the definition of a name (above) and see what we get.  

In this ordinary definition of “person” (as used in definition number “1”, above), the word “person” means “human being”, as is commonly understood outside of Statute re-definitions (where “person” has been intentionally redefined).  

Here is the “ordinary” definition of “person”, quoted below: person - (from www.dictionary.com) - ordinary meaning: noun 

1. a human being, whether man, woman, or child.  

2. a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing.  

3. Sociology .  an individual human being, especially with reference to his or her social relationships and behavioural patterns as conditioned by the culture.  

4. Philosophy .  a self-conscious or rational being.  The NAME Game - The Trick Used by the Legal System. the actual self or individual personality of a human being: You ought not to generalize, but to consider the person you are dealing with.  Therefore, the name of a person is the designator of a human being (in common parlance), by which the person is called or known.  

Nowhere in any of these definitions is the claim made that the name “identifies” the person (or human being), and nowhere is any claim made that the name of a person is to be regarded to be the same as that person.  It is patently obvious that the name of a person is not the same as the person himself, otherwise, there would be thousands of “Bob Smiths” in the world, each one being the same as each other.  

It is a logical fallacy to presume that the name and the person are one and the same as each other, and anybody holding that belief needs to re-examine his false beliefs, perhaps with a psychologist.  

The conclusion is that all names are designators and only point to an object.  The NAME Game is used to trick us into thinking that the name of a person is the same as that person, which is simply not true, unless we agree with the “trick”: trick - (from www.dictionary.com) - ordinary meaning: noun 

1. a crafty or underhanded device, maneuver, stratagem, or the like, intended to deceive or cheat; artifice; ruse; wile.  

2. an optical illusion: It must have been some visual trick caused by the flickering candlelight.  

3. a roguish or mischievous act; practical joke; prank: She likes to play tricks on her friends.  

4. a mean, foolish, or childish action.  

5. a clever or ingenious device or expedient; adroit technique: the tricks of the trade.

Friday, March 23, 2018

Maxims of Law


https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/LegalRef/MaximsOfLaw.htm



Bills of Exchange Act 1882

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/45-46/61

Does nuclear waste dissolve?

Nuclear waste is a mixture of various substances but held within the fuel rods which are encased in zircaloy, and these are not soluble in water.  In fact the spent fuel is stored under water to both keep it cool and prevent radiation to power plant staff.  This is safe for the short to medium term, but for long term storage something more permanent is required.  Over thousands of years the fuel cladding could deteriorate and allow radioactive substances to leak out, and there could be some contamination if water was to flow through the storage area.  So the long term store needs to be underground but in a geological formation which is known not to have had water present in the past.

Bills of Exchange (explained)

Form of commercial credit instrument, or IOU, used in international trade.  In Britain, a bill of exchange is defined by the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 as an unconditional order in writing addressed by one person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time a certain sum in money to or to the order of a specified person, or to the bearer.

UK - Bills of Exchange Act 1882 - Discharge of Bill

Discharge of Bill

59 Payment in due course.
(1) A bill is discharged by payment in due course by or on behalf of the drawee or acceptor.

“Payment in due course” means payment made at or after the maturity of the bill to the holder thereof in good faith and without notice that his title to the bill is defective.

(2) Subject to the provisions herein-after contained, when a bill is paid by the drawer or an indorser it is not discharged; but

(a) Where a bill payable to, or to the order of, a third party is paid by the drawer, the drawer may enforce payment thereof against the acceptor, but may not re-issue the bill.

(b) Where a bill is paid by an indorser, or where a bill payable to drawer’s order is paid by the drawer, the party paying it is remitted to his former rights as regards the acceptor or antecedent parties, and he may, if he thinks fit, strike out his own subsequentindorsements, and again negotiate the bill.

(3) Where an accommodation bill is paid in due course by the party accommodated the bill is discharged.

60 Banker paying demand draft whereon indorsement is forged 
When a bill payable to order on demand is drawn on a banker, and the banker on whom it is drawn pays the bill in good faith and in the ordinary course of business, it is not incumbent on the banker to show that the indorsement of the payee or any subsequent indorsement was made by or under the authority of the person whose indorsement it purports to be, and the banker is deemed to have paid the bill in due course, although such indorsement has been forged or made without authority.

61 Acceptor the holder at maturity.
When the acceptor of a bill is or becomes the holder of it at or after its maturity, in his own right, the bill is discharged.

62 Express waiver.
(1)When the holder of a bill at or after its maturity absolutely and unconditionally renounces his rights against the acceptor the bill is discharged.

The renunciation must be in writing, unless the bill is delivered up to the acceptor.

(2)The liabilities of any party to a bill may in like manner be renounced by the holder before, at, or after its maturity; but nothing in this section shall affect the rights of a holder in due course without notice of the renunciation.

63 Cancellation.
(1)Where a bill is intentionally cancelled by the holder or his agent, and the cancellation is apparent thereon, the bill is discharged.

(2)In like manner any party liable on a bill may be discharged by the intentional cancellation of his signature by the holder or his agent. 

In such case any indorser who would have had a right of recourse against the party whose signature is cancelled is also discharged.

(3) A cancellation made unintentionally, or under a mistake, or without the authority of the holder is inoperative; but where a bill or any signature thereon appears to have been cancelled the burden of proof lies on the party who alleges that the cancellation was made unintentionally, or under a mistake, or without authority.

64 Alteration of bill.
(1) Where a bill or acceptance is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable on the bill, the bill is avoided except as against a party who has himself made, authorised, or assented to the alteration, and subsequent indorsers.

Provided that,Where a bill has been materially altered, but the alteration is not apparent, and the bill is in the hands of a holder in due course, such holder may avail himself of the bill as if it had not been altered, and may enforce payment of it according to its original tenor.

(2) In particular the following alterations are material, namely, any alteration of the date, the sum payable, the time of payment, the place of payment, and, where a bill has been accepted generally, the addition of a place of payment without the acceptor’s assent.

BANK OF ENGLAND ACT (1694)

            BANK OF ENGLAND ACT 1694
                                   (5 & 6 Will. & Mar. c. 20)

An Act for granting to their Majesties several Rates and Duties upon Tunnage of Ships and Vesselsand upon BeerAleand other Liquors, for securing certainRecompences and Advantages in the said Act mentioned, to such Persons as shallvoluntarily advance the Sum of Fifteen hundred thousand Pounds towards carrying on the War against France.
 

Sections 1 to 15 and section 17 repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1867.  Sections 16 and 18 repealed by the
Statute Law Revision Act 1966
.


19 Their Majesties may appoint Rules for transferring: and may make the Subscriberscorporationsubject to Redemption And … that it shall and may be lawful to and for their Majesties, by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of Englandto limitdirect, and appoint how and in what Manner and Proportions and under what Rules andDirections, the said Sum of Twelve hundred thousand Pounds, Part of the said Sum of Fifteen hundred thousand Pounds, and the said yearly Sum of One hundred thousand Pounds, Part of the said yearly Sum of One hundred and forty thousand Pounds, and every, or any Part or Proportion thereof, may be assignable or transferableassigned ortransferred, to such Person or Persons only as shall freely and voluntarily accept of the same, and not otherwise; and to incorporate all and every such Subscribers andContributors, their … Successors, or Assigns, to be one Body Corporate and Politick, by the name of The Governor and Company of the Bank of England, and by thesame Name of The Governor and Company of the Bank of England to haveperpetual Succession, and a Common Seal, and that they and their Successors, by the Name aforesaid, shall be able and capable in Law to havepurchasereceive,possessenjoyand retain to them and their SuccessorsLandsRentsTenements andHereditaments, of what Kind, Nature, or Quality soever; and also to sellgrantdemise,alien, or dispose of the same; and by the same Name to sue and implead, and besued and impleaded, answer and be answered
in Courts of Record, or any other Place whatsover, and to do and execute all and singular other Matters and Things by the Name aforesaid, that to them shall or may appertain to do; subject nevertheless to the Proviso and Condition of Redemptionherein after mentioned.   


First words omitted repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1888, and second words omitted repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 1948.


Section 20 repealed by the Bank of England Act 1708 and the Statute Law Revision Act1867.  Section 21 repealed by the
Bank Act 1892.  Sections 22 to 24 repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1867 and section 25 repealed by the Bank of
England Act 1946.



26 Corporation not to trade – Punishment
And to the Intent that their Majesties Subjects may not be oppressed by the saidCorporation, by their monopolizing or ingrossing any Sort of GoodsWares, orMerchandizes, the said Corporation to be made and created by this Act shall not at any 


Time, during the Continuance thereofdeal or trade, or permit or suffer any Person orPersons whatsoever, either in Trust or for the Benefit of the same, to deal or trade with any of the Stock Moneys, or Effects of, or any Ways belonging to the saidCorporation, in the buying or selling of any Goods, Wares, or Merchandizeswhatsoever; and every Person or Persons who shall so deal or trade, or by whoseOrder or Directions such Dealings or Trading shall be made, prosecuted or managed, shall forfeit for every such Dealing or Trading, and every such Order and Directions, treble the Value of the Goods and Merchandize so traded for, to such Person orPersons who shall sue for the same by Action [in the High Court].


Section 26 amended by the Common Informers Act 1951 and words in square brackets substituted by the Supreme Court
of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925.


27 In what things they may nevertheless deal
Provided that nothing herein contained shall any Ways be construed to hinder the saidCorporation from dealing in Bills of Exchange, or in buying or selling BullionGold or Silveror in selling any GoodsWares or Merchandize whatsoever, which shall really and bona fide by left or deposited with the said Corporation for Money lent and advanced thereon, and which shall not be redeemed at the Time agreed on, or within Three Months after, or from selling such Goods as shall or may be the Produce of Lands purchased by the said Corporation.



Section 28 repealed by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1976. Sections 29 to 31 repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1948. Sections 32 and 34 repealed by the Bank Act1892. Sections 33 and 35 to 48 repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1867.  TheAct, as reproduced here, is taken from ‘Acts relating to the Bank Vol 1 published in 1694.

Legal is the "FACT"- OF law, and not the LAW, but concerning the FACT only

This is not "Legal" advice", it is "Lawful" advice
     ================================
Legal is the "FACT"-lawbut concerning the FACT onlyand not Lawful

Legal-"FACT"-ilegal-unlawfulA "FACT" can be a lie and truth, together, it might embody the truth, but its not, its an office intrument, office document.  "FACT" without truth is not law.  It has the appearance of law.  Its has only "FACT" within that office, but not outside of it. 

In a de"fact"o - A fact is a fact, not necessarily concerning the truth, truth/lie, its a fact.  A fact can be created from a lie, being the truth, but in fact, it is not the truth, but afact, and its a lie/truth and unlawful.

In dejure - Truth is truth and as well does concern facts, but not on its own.  Truth is found within the heart.  TruthfulLawful and justful.


LAW-"TRUTH"-lawful: The law is the truth, it comes from the good of man a woman, and not from an office.
     ==========================================  

It is, but one element of it, hence it becomes a lack of the principle, law.

Without the principle, Law, the real Law from the creator, then the concerning law of"FACT"legal means nothing to good menwoman and children, it is an unlawfulact of a criminal, but on the other hand, if you commit a crime, then you have to abide by that legal "FACT", still not the law, its part of a law, but not the whole of it, and not truth, a corruption of the truth/lie.  Its more of a negative, law than a positive,law, with lots of elements missing, it could be classed as a Defacto.

Hundreds of so called legal books, written by men in office, created for the man or woman in office fictionFictions cannot create real lawthey can create law for themselves.  The real law, is mine, yours and every ones, my creator, your creator, created that law within each and everyone of the real people.  Truth is a huge aspect of the law, the "FACT" and truth are LAW, with more elements added to it, so a"FACT" of law, concerning the law.   
Without Dejure lawdefacto is lacking, humanity.  Legal is a factlegal is not law, it islaw in commerce.  An element of one thing cannot be an element of another, unless itsbeen added too.  The LAW is higher than legal.  
     ===========================================
Maxim of Law: The Law can give rise to a fiction; a fiction cannot give rise to the law  
     ===========================================
QUESTIONS
What is a court?
What does a court do?
How does a court work?
Who does the court work for?  
Who are the people in court?
What are they, there for? 
Why are they there?
Are courts for criminals only?
Do we need to go to court, if none has committing an offence?  
Is it criminal to to ignore a court?  
Why does Education not teach about the court procedures?
If legal is unlawful, and lawful is the law, then the truth must be one or the other, it cannot be both. 
     =================================
Law created by a man, is for that man only, if law is then created to be put upon other men, then that becomes an unlawful act.  Who has the right to dictate what people do or think, NOONE.  Its what makes a man a man and woman a woman, to be one with the Creator, and a fiction, with there minor laws ("FACT"), to be one without the Creators knowledge, corrupted by entity's in so called high places.  Don't exist. 
     ======================================= 
The Bible: John 8:32 Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
     ===============================================
                         Poem: If

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too:
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or, being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise;

If you can dream---and not make dreams your master;
If you can think---and not make thoughts your aim,
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same:.
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build'em up with worn-out tools;

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings,
And never breathe a word about your loss:
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with Kings---nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much:
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And---which is more---you'll be a Man, my son! 


Author: Rudyard Kipling

Privateering in Action, Evidencing Scandal pt 2

Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wigelyzzGg

While the masses believe these evictions are over property, the reality is that they are over your estate., The property is a tool to keep our awareness of the system valuating our energy/labor by their method of hypothecation where bonds are traded on allcommercial or legal issues, diverted into belief that its only about the houses.  The estate, is youyour heirstheir heirstheir heirs, etc...all descendents.  When the estate is seized, this creates a hypothecated-human being, called commercial paper, from this point in time, that human is negotiated by court process, as negotiable instruments, stemming from the Negotiable Instruments Act, and now known as Uniform Commercial Code...this, is human trafficking.  This, is promoting prostitution, as the CUSIP numberis based on debentureor debt secured by your own earning power(prostitution).

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Corporation Nation

                                                July, 02, 2017 - corporation nation archives

Friday, March 16, 2018

Epithet

Names
and =+ add on                          Add on, Epithet
Surnames   



Your Birth Certificate has Name's in the top left side followed by the word "AND" and then Surname.  Your Name is what you were given at Birth by your Mother or Father or Both.  Your real living name.

My Name would be ---------------- ----------- -----------. And would look like this on the Birth Certificate 
Name(s) ----- -----
and =+ or add on
Surname  ----- Legal Fiction



Name ----- ------

and =+ add on

Surname - Legal Fiction

Monday, March 12, 2018

Can you prove that i am a "person" that is the subject of your Statutes, Codes, and Regulations?

Can you prove that i am a "person" that is the subject of your Statutes, Codes, and Regulations?

Can you prove that i am a person of your law?

Human (Etymology) - (adj) belonging to man. From Latin Humanus "OF man"

So can a human describe a being that is "OF" man?

So i was created by God and therefore i cannot be a human unless i choose to be a creation "OF" man.

Sunday, March 11, 2018

Espionage, part 2 - Another look at what espionage means, from a different perspective, or different eyes (opened eyes)

Espionage, part 2

Another look at what espionage means, from a different perspective, or different eyes(opened eyes).

By the way, Intelligence is non-sence.

Intelligence is a fictional conceptan idea, it has nothing to do with a real living man.



Espionage is spying, and Intelligence gathering is spying too, it is the same thing, that is the real Criminals at work.

The same side in=green
  ===========================

There is nothing lawful here, apart from the living, man


Fictional
Legal
laws 
Criminals
NAME
ID
Agent 
Person

Job 
Councils
Governments 
Country 
Sabotage
Espionage
Date and Information
Forces
Counterintelligence
Military
Army 
Enemies 
Cams 
Spying 
Citizen
Resident
Tenent 

Individual
Patriarch
Officers

============================
Who are the real Criminals?

Would you know real criminals, if you were blinded by lies, which you believed all your life were true, but they were in fact, all lies, and they got you to believe in it?
     =====================================

Espionage
A different perspective

Espionage or spying (CAMS, placed within buildings, and STREET CAMS, placed within the streets of ordinary people), involves a government or individual(COUNCILS) obtaining information considered secret or confidential {without the permission of the holder of the information}.

Espionage is inherently clandestine, as it is taken for granted that it is unwelcome and, in many cases illegal and punishable by law.  It is a {subset of intelligencegathering}, which otherwise may be conducted from public sources and using perfectly
legal-(CRIMINAL) and ethical means.  It is crucial to distinguish espionage from{intelligence gathering}, as the latter does not necessarily involve espionage, but often collates open-source information.

Espionage is often part of an institutional effort by a government or commercialconcern, however the term is generally associated with {state spying} on potential or actual enemies primarily for military purposes.

Spying involving corporations-(NAME-PERSONis known as industrial espionage.

One of the most effective ways to gather data and information about an enemy (orpotential enemy) is by infiltrating the enemy's ranks.  This is the job of the spy(espionage agent).  Spies can bring back all sorts of information concerning the size and strength of an enemy army.  They can also find dissidents within the enemy's forces and influence them to defect.  In times of crisisspies can also be used to steal technology and to sabotage the enemy in various ways.

Counterintelligence operatives can feed false information to enemy spiesprotecting important domestic secrets and preventing attempts at subversion.

Nearly every country has very strict laws concerning espionage, and the penalty for being caught is often severe.  However, the benefits that can be gained throughespionage are generally great enough that most governments and many largecorporations-(NAME-PERSON) make use of it to varying degrees.