STATUTES ARE NOT LAW:
This NOTICE is a just and modest self defense for any people and well below the precedent set by James C. Trezevant v City of Tampa wherein the damages established were at $25,000 for 23 minutes of unlawful detainment. That remedy calculates to more than $1.5 million per day.
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION - The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the code, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”, [Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261]
People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 286. “A statute does not trump the
Constitution.”
Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60, "Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.”
People v. Battle: “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”
Supreme Court Ruling [Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489] “The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.”
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262 (1963): “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.”
19 Cal.Jur. 54, § 407: ”The streets of a city belong to the people of the state, and the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen…”
In Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, the U.S Supreme Court states very plainly: "The state cannot diminish rights of the people."
Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009: “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a Liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”
SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 April 21, 1969. Further, the Right to
TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can
NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such
TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open
highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. "The rights of the individuals are
restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the
citizenship to the agencies of government.”
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION - "All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God's laws. All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…" Rodriques v. Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985).
TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE YOU MUST GIVE YOUR CONSENT, AND I DO NOT GIVE MY CONSENT.
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION - "…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent." Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.
US. SUPREME COURT DECISION - "For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights." - Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944 “To take away all remedy for the enforcement of a right
is to take away the right itself. But that is not within the power of the State.”
In re McCowan (1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100 "Ignorance of the law does not excuse
misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law."
(42 U.S.C. 14141), Cause of Action (A)(B)- makes it unlawful for state or local law
enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that
deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws commonly referred to as the
Police Misconduct Statute. The United States is authorized to initiate a civil investigation
into allegations regarding systemic violations of the Constitution by law enforcement
agencies. As stated above, the investigation of OCSO is focused solely on an alleged pattern or
practice of excessive force in OCSO’s ECW use.
Greenwood v Peacock (1966) 384 US 808, 16 L Ed 2d 944, 86 S Ct 1800. Persons who are
denied rights guaranteed to them under federal law may vindicate these rights in appropriate
cases by various remedies in federal courts, such as direct review by United States Supreme
Court, obtaining injunction or habeas corpus, bringing suit for damages under 42 USC 1983, or
invoking criminal sanctions under 18 USC 241, 242.
Right to Travel
DESPITE ACTIONS OF POLICE AND LOCAL COURTS, HIGHER COURTS HAVE RULED THAT AMERICAN CITIZENS HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT STATE PERMITS (I.E. LICENSE PLATES, DRIVER’S LICENSE, REGISTRATION AND CAR INSURANCE).
Common Law Right to Travel:
1.“The RIGHT TO TRAVEL is an unconditional personal right whose exercise may NOT be conditioned.”
- Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 92 S Ct 995, 31 L Ed 2d 274. [5 U.S. Dig, Constitutional Law, and 101.5, Right of interstate of international travel.]
NO LICENSE IS REQUIRED OF THE NATURAL INDIVIDUAL TRAVELING FOR PERSONAL BUSINESS, PLEASURE AND TRANSPORTATION.”
- Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 [1972]
Article v. Amendment “The RIGHTS of the Citizen TO TRAVEL upon the public highways and to transport his/her property there on by carriage or automobile, is NOT a mere privilege, which a city (or state) may prohibit or permit at will, but a Common Right, which he/she has under the RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
Thompson v. Smith 154SE579
“PERSONS” are men considered by their rank in society, with all their rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes him.
(Bouvier’s law.) A PERSON by statute claim is a firm, corporation, associations, labor organization, partnership, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers (i.e. the legal fiction.).
I am a PRIVATE PERSON, not the incumbent of an office.
