- all spiritual man and woman, are equal , in true heart - |||||||||| truth, law is within you, "dead to (Legal law, at law). In law you live to god". private/living/spirit/livingsoul,life/consciousness
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Friday, October 5, 2018
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
Monday, July 9, 2018
National ID Card: URGENT AND EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, ESPECIALLY FOR BRITAIN:
http://www.natural-person.ca/nationalid.html
This page has been posted as an introductory page for the National ID Card. A more comprehensive page is begin prepared and should be ready soon. Until such time, this should make you think about the dangers of having a National ID Card:
Question: What is wrong with a National ID Card?
Answer: Nothing, as long as you don't mind being a slave for the rest of your life.
Question: How does a National ID Card make me a slave?
Answer: The Card 'identifies' you as the property of the government.
Question: What is the definition of Identify and/or Identity? Answer: The definition of Identify and/or Identity means 'the same as'.
Question: How can a National ID Card make me the property of the government?
Answer: The ID Card is only for legal entities, and therefore the Card 'identifies' you to be 'the same as' the legal entity (artificial person) which exists on the Card.
Question: Who has legal title to the ID Card?
Answer: The government has legal title to the ID Card (they created it), and therefore has legal title to the legal entity (artificial person) created thereon. The holder of the ID Card may have equitable title (to use) the Card.
Question: What happens when I agree to have a National ID Card? Answer: By agreeing to be identified by the Card, you have just agreed (by contract) to be 'the same as' the legal entity which was created by the government. In other words, you have agreed, by contract, to be owned by the government (because they own the entity and now you have agreed to be the same as the entity, so they own you).
Question: Can I terminate the contract if I already have a National ID Card?
Answer: No. According to contract law, unless written otherwise into the contract, the contract will only be terminated when both parties to the contract agree to termination. Although you may wish to terminate the contract, the government will never agree to do so. You are their slave for life, and your property (children, estate, etc.) becomes their property in perpetuity (forever).
Question: Who can identify me?
Answer: You, your God (if he shows up), and possibly your parents (provided babies were not swapped). Practically speaking, only YOU can identify you for sure, nobody else. You have to self-identify, viz: "I am the same as I am, I am I and nobody else."
Question: How can a government tell me who I am?
Answer: The government cannot tell you who you are, but if you agree to be the same as their entity, now they can tell you who you are and make you their slave.
Solution: Know who you are, and don't let anybody else tell you who you are. Whatever you do, DO NOT agree to have a National ID Card if you wish to remain free.
A slave once said "Oh master, please tell me who I am."
This page has been posted as an introductory page for the National ID Card. A more comprehensive page is begin prepared and should be ready soon. Until such time, this should make you think about the dangers of having a National ID Card:
Question: What is wrong with a National ID Card?
Answer: Nothing, as long as you don't mind being a slave for the rest of your life.
Question: How does a National ID Card make me a slave?
Answer: The Card 'identifies' you as the property of the government.
Question: What is the definition of Identify and/or Identity? Answer: The definition of Identify and/or Identity means 'the same as'.
Question: How can a National ID Card make me the property of the government?
Answer: The ID Card is only for legal entities, and therefore the Card 'identifies' you to be 'the same as' the legal entity (artificial person) which exists on the Card.
Question: Who has legal title to the ID Card?
Answer: The government has legal title to the ID Card (they created it), and therefore has legal title to the legal entity (artificial person) created thereon. The holder of the ID Card may have equitable title (to use) the Card.
Question: What happens when I agree to have a National ID Card? Answer: By agreeing to be identified by the Card, you have just agreed (by contract) to be 'the same as' the legal entity which was created by the government. In other words, you have agreed, by contract, to be owned by the government (because they own the entity and now you have agreed to be the same as the entity, so they own you).
Question: Can I terminate the contract if I already have a National ID Card?
Answer: No. According to contract law, unless written otherwise into the contract, the contract will only be terminated when both parties to the contract agree to termination. Although you may wish to terminate the contract, the government will never agree to do so. You are their slave for life, and your property (children, estate, etc.) becomes their property in perpetuity (forever).
Question: Who can identify me?
Answer: You, your God (if he shows up), and possibly your parents (provided babies were not swapped). Practically speaking, only YOU can identify you for sure, nobody else. You have to self-identify, viz: "I am the same as I am, I am I and nobody else."
Question: How can a government tell me who I am?
Answer: The government cannot tell you who you are, but if you agree to be the same as their entity, now they can tell you who you are and make you their slave.
Solution: Know who you are, and don't let anybody else tell you who you are. Whatever you do, DO NOT agree to have a National ID Card if you wish to remain free.
A slave once said "Oh master, please tell me who I am."
Tuesday, June 26, 2018
Names are Designators of Things
The Name Game
Designator
================================================
the name of a person is the designator of a human being (in common parlance), by which the person is called or known. Nowhere in any of these definitions is the claim made that the name “identifies” the person (or human being), and nowhere is any claim made that the name of a person is to be regarded to be the same as that person. ================================================
From an ordinary dictionary (not a law dictionary) we get the ordinary meaning of words. Later on, we deal with law dictionaries, but for now, we stay with “ordinary” meanings. From the “ordinary” online Dictionary Definition (www.dictionary.com), we check the definition of the word “name”, and we read that a name is used to designate (point to) or call things or refer to known things. From this definition you can see that the name of an item is not the same as the item itself, but is a means to designate the item: name - (from www.dictionary.com) - ordinary meaning: noun
Designator
================================================
the name of a person is the designator of a human being (in common parlance), by which the person is called or known. Nowhere in any of these definitions is the claim made that the name “identifies” the person (or human being), and nowhere is any claim made that the name of a person is to be regarded to be the same as that person. ================================================
From an ordinary dictionary (not a law dictionary) we get the ordinary meaning of words. Later on, we deal with law dictionaries, but for now, we stay with “ordinary” meanings. From the “ordinary” online Dictionary Definition (www.dictionary.com), we check the definition of the word “name”, and we read that a name is used to designate (point to) or call things or refer to known things. From this definition you can see that the name of an item is not the same as the item itself, but is a means to designate the item: name - (from www.dictionary.com) - ordinary meaning: noun
1. a word or a combination of words by which a person, place, or thing, a body or class, or any object of thought is designated, called, or known.
2. mere designation, as distinguished from fact: He was a king in name only.
3. an appellation, title, or epithet, applied descriptively, in honour, abuse, etc.
4. a reputation of a particular kind given by common opinion: to protect one's good name.
5. a distinguished, famous, or great reputation; fame: to make a name for oneself. From definition #1 above, we see that a name is a word (or combination) by which something (an item) is “designated, called, or known”.
Thus, the name is not the same as the item itself; it is how we refer to the item. Definition number “2” gives an alternative understanding of a name as a “mere designation, as distinguished from fact”.
What about the name of a person? Same things apply. As an example, let's incorporate the word “person” from the definition of a name (above) and see what we get.
In this ordinary definition of “person” (as used in definition number “1”, above), the word “person” means “human being”, as is commonly understood outside of Statute re-definitions (where “person” has been intentionally redefined).
Here is the “ordinary” definition of “person”, quoted below: person - (from www.dictionary.com) - ordinary meaning: noun
1. a human being, whether man, woman, or child.
2. a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing.
3. Sociology . an individual human being, especially with reference to his or her social relationships and behavioural patterns as conditioned by the culture.
4. Philosophy . a self-conscious or rational being. The NAME Game - The Trick Used by the Legal System. the actual self or individual personality of a human being: You ought not to generalize, but to consider the person you are dealing with. Therefore, the name of a person is the designator of a human being (in common parlance), by which the person is called or known.
Nowhere in any of these definitions is the claim made that the name “identifies” the person (or human being), and nowhere is any claim made that the name of a person is to be regarded to be the same as that person. It is patently obvious that the name of a person is not the same as the person himself, otherwise, there would be thousands of “Bob Smiths” in the world, each one being the same as each other.
It is a logical fallacy to presume that the name and the person are one and the same as each other, and anybody holding that belief needs to re-examine his false beliefs, perhaps with a psychologist.
The conclusion is that all names are designators and only point to an object. The NAME Game is used to trick us into thinking that the name of a person is the same as that person, which is simply not true, unless we agree with the “trick”: trick - (from www.dictionary.com) - ordinary meaning: noun
1. a crafty or underhanded device, maneuver, stratagem, or the like, intended to deceive or cheat; artifice; ruse; wile.
2. an optical illusion: It must have been some visual trick caused by the flickering candlelight.
3. a roguish or mischievous act; practical joke; prank: She likes to play tricks on her friends.
4. a mean, foolish, or childish action.
5. a clever or ingenious device or expedient; adroit technique: the tricks of the trade.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
This quotation was reprinted in the Idaho Leader, USA, on 26th August 1924, and has been read into the Australian Federal Hansard twice: by...
-
Original Article : Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 - 1666 CHAPTER 11 18 and 19 Cha 2 Link: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/18-19/11 ...
-
https://thepeopleslawyeruk.com/wp-content/uploads/Exhibit-8a-Clearfield-doctrine.pdf All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfiel...